All Rights Reserved Podcast

Young N Reckless, the revolutionary hip hop group that has been making waves since they first formed, has announced a new single on Presidents Day. 

The song is being considered quite controversial as it addresses the hypocrisy of the political system. Their aim is to point out the critical flaws of the federal government, the hypocrites that are a part of it, and in addition open the eyes of those who actually listen to the song.  

Young N Reckless is definitely  not new to controversy. Their previous blog posts about voting received a significant amount of comments. The post shed light about individual votes and if they are even accounted for.  

“All Rights Reserved” is the latest single to be released from the group since the petition for “Conflict of Interest” was launched in 2016.  The unreleased project is available through petition only. It is is not a public relations prank. Instead, it is a result of the daring look that they take at the United States. The petition for Conflict Of Interest focuses on the Freedom of Information Act, which allows for full or partial disclosure of unreleased information controlled by the government of the U.S. 

While many people have requested the album, it is not publicly distributed due to its content. However, a simple request will allow people to hear “Conflict of Interest” in order to learn more about what the  group’s thoughts are politically. 

Young N Reckless does not provide many interviews as they believe their music to speak for itself. They feel this allows them to control the narrative surrounding their message and ensures nothing is misconstrued. Their insightful lyrics, along with the overall vibe, engage many to enjoy the music as well as to gain a new understanding of politics. 

If anything, Young N Reckless has been able to stir the pot and get Americans to start thinking about the system in new and different ways. Their music has always been to achieve this and the “All Rights Reserved” single is no different. The release of it on President’s Day was not by coincidence, either. 

/
  1. All Rights Reserved

108 comments

  • Christine Pelosi

    Christine Pelosi California

    "We've gotta understand history. Of course you know the victor always gets to write history and the loser doesn't get much. And of course the victor is never always right nor necessarily is he always wrong, nor is the loser. But if you study the victors point of view who writes the officially history and the losers point of view and if you study these two points somewhere in between is the TRUTH.

    "We've gotta understand history. Of course you know the victor always gets to write history and the loser doesn't get much. And of course the victor is never always right nor necessarily is he always wrong, nor is the loser. But if you study the victors point of view who writes the officially history and the losers point of view and if you study these two points somewhere in between is the TRUTH.

  • Faith A. Garamendi

    Faith A. Garamendi Davis

    Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain. Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this. 1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871. 1871........ that is a 147 years ago With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

    Since the Act of 1871 which established the District of Columbia, we have been living under the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is owned by certain international bankers and aristocracy of Europe and Britain.
    Some people do not understand that ONE WORD or TWO WORDS difference in any “legal” document DO make the critical difference. But, Congress has known, and does know, this.

    1871, February 21: Congress Passes an Act to Provide a Government for the District of Columbia, also known as the Act of 1871. 1871........ that is a 147 years ago

    With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress creates a separate form of government for the District of Columbia, a ten mile square parcel of land (see, Acts of the Forty-first Congress,” Section 34, Session III, chapters 61 and 62).

  • Vinzenz J. Koller

    Vinzenz J. Koller Carmel

    Not only is February 21st the anniversary of the CORPORATION, it is also the day Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965. I definitely do not think this was a coincidence. Long live Malcolm X “I'm not a politician, not even a student of politics; in fact, I'm not a student of much of anything. I'm not a Democrat. I'm not a Republican, and I don't even consider myself an American. If you and I were Americans, there'd be no problem. Those Honkies that just got off the boat, they're already Americans; Polacks are already Americans; the Italian refugees are already Americans. Everything that came out of Europe, every blue-eyed thing, is already an American. And as long as you and I have been over here, we aren't Americans yet.” Well, I am one who doesn't believe in deluding myself. I'm not going to sit at your table and watch you eat, with nothing on my plate, and call myself a diner. Sitting at the table doesn't make you a diner, unless you eat some of what's on that plate. Being here in America doesn't make you an American. Being born here in America doesn't make you an American. Why, if birth made you American, you wouldn't need any legislation; you wouldn't need any amendments to the Constitution; you wouldn't be faced with civil-rights filibustering in Washington, D.C., right now. They don't have to pass civil-rights legislation to make a Polack an American. No, I'm not an American. I'm one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of Americanism. One of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy. So, I'm not standing here speaking to you as an American, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver -- no, not I. I'm speaking as a victim of this American system. And I see America through the eyes of the victim. I don't see any American dream; I see an American nightmare. “ Malcom X

    Not only is February 21st the anniversary of the CORPORATION, it is also the day Malcolm X was assassinated in 1965. I definitely do not think this was a coincidence. Long live Malcolm X

    “I'm not a politician, not even a student of politics; in fact, I'm not a student of much of anything. I'm not a Democrat. I'm not a Republican, and I don't even consider myself an American. If you and I were Americans, there'd be no problem. Those Honkies that just got off the boat, they're already Americans; Polacks are already Americans; the Italian refugees are already Americans. Everything that came out of Europe, every blue-eyed thing, is already an American. And as long as you and I have been over here, we aren't Americans yet.”

    Well, I am one who doesn't believe in deluding myself. I'm not going to sit at your table and watch you eat, with nothing on my plate, and call myself a diner. Sitting at the table doesn't make you a diner, unless you eat some of what's on that plate. Being here in America doesn't make you an American. Being born here in America doesn't make you an American. Why, if birth made you American, you wouldn't need any legislation; you wouldn't need any amendments to the Constitution; you wouldn't be faced with civil-rights filibustering in Washington, D.C., right now. They don't have to pass civil-rights legislation to make a Polack an American.

    No, I'm not an American. I'm one of the 22 million black people who are the victims of Americanism. One of the 22 million black people who are the victims of democracy, nothing but disguised hypocrisy. So, I'm not standing here speaking to you as an American, or a patriot, or a flag-saluter, or a flag-waver -- no, not I. I'm speaking as a victim of this American system. And I see America through the eyes of the victim. I don't see any American dream; I see an American nightmare. “ Malcom X

  • Scott Wilfong

    Scott Wilfong New Orleans

    You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down to them a very very important statute and renaming of the park from Robert E Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner??? So will George Washington now lose his status.? Are we going to take down statutes of George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson what you think about Thomas Jefferson, you like him? Ok good are we going to take down his statutes cuz he was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statutes?

    You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down to them a very very important statute and renaming of the park from Robert E Lee to another name. George Washington was a slave owner. Was George Washington a slave owner??? So will George Washington now lose his status.? Are we going to take down statutes of George Washington? How about Thomas Jefferson what you think about Thomas Jefferson, you like him? Ok good are we going to take down his statutes cuz he was a major slave owner. Are we going to take down his statutes?

  • Kelly Mitchell

    Kelly Mitchell Flint

    Much respect to the legend Malcolm X. And he is right to an extent However as a "person of color" I will claim to be American. Not African American not black but American. In fact since we dropping gems dig this -----> AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

    Much respect to the legend Malcolm X. And he is right to an extent However as a "person of color" I will claim to be American. Not African American not black but American. In fact since we dropping gems dig this ----->

    AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

  • Keith Gibson

    Keith Gibson Arkansas

    Oh niggas bout to start a revolution I see 👀 (grabs popcorn) shares post

    Oh niggas bout to start a revolution I see 👀 (grabs popcorn) shares post

  • Jerad Sutton

    Jerad Sutton Colorado

    All natives are not citizens of the United States; the descendants of the aborigines, and those of African origins, are not entitled to the rights of citizens. Anterior to the adoption of the constitution of the United States, each state had the right to make citizens of such persons as it pleased. That constitution does not authorize any but white persons to become citizens of the United States; and it must therefore be presumed that no one is a citizens who is not white. [1 Litt. R. 334; 10 Conn. R. 340; 1 Meigs, R. 331 “All Rights Reserved”

    All natives are not citizens of the United States; the descendants of the aborigines, and those of African origins, are not entitled to the rights of citizens. Anterior to the adoption of the constitution of the United States, each state had the right to make citizens of such persons as it pleased. That constitution does not authorize any but white persons to become citizens of the United States; and it must therefore be presumed that no one is a citizens who is not white. [1 Litt. R. 334; 10 Conn. R. 340; 1 Meigs, R. 331 “All Rights Reserved”

  • Anita Bonds

    Anita Bonds Washington DC

    It so much I have to say in regards to this record much more the concept of "All Rights Reserved" I must admit reading through the comments have distracted me as I recently read Louis Farrakhans quote about not being the person behind assasinating Malcolm X. Nevertheless Young N Reckless knows how to pull back the curtains and speak to the core of the problem. I hope the much needed discourse gets the minds of tomorrow to put forth a solution.

    It so much I have to say in regards to this record much more the concept of "All Rights Reserved" I must admit reading through the comments have distracted me as I recently read Louis Farrakhans quote about not being the person behind assasinating Malcolm X.

    Nevertheless Young N Reckless knows how to pull back the curtains and speak to the core of the problem. I hope the much needed discourse gets the minds of tomorrow to put forth a solution.

  • Elbert Peters

    Elbert Peters Alabama

    8 U.S. Code § 1401 -Nationals and citizens of United States at birth The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth: a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof; (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

    8 U.S. Code § 1401 -Nationals and citizens of United States at birth

    The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
    a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof;
    (b) a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe: Provided, That the granting of citizenship under this subsection shall not in any manner impair or otherwise affect the right of such person to tribal or other property;

  • Michael Barnett

    Michael Barnett Florida

    The hypocrisy of America is reflected in every statute and school book. But of course the victor gets the spoils. The sad thing it's really only a 153 years since the start of the Civil War. While America's children continue to be brainwashed in believing that Lincoln was the savior of the black man, the congressman from Illinois tells a different tail in his forth debate with Steven Douglas at Charleston Illinois on September 18, 1858. Quote, I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and politically quality of the white and black races. I am not now nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negros. Nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. And I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior. And I as much as any other men am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. The long list of Lincoln's recorded remarks which would readily and fervently be condemns as racist hate speech today, includes his views on the expansion of slavery. Lincoln wrote " There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation, that is mixture of the white and black races. A separation of the races is the only perfect preventative of amalgamation. But as the immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together. if white and black people never get together in Kansas, they will never mix blood in Kansas. On interracial marriage Lincoln said, "Our republican system was meant for homogeneous people. As long as black continue to live with the whites, they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of breeds bastards may someday challenge the supremacy of the white men." "All Rights Reserved"

    The hypocrisy of America is reflected in every statute and school book. But of course the victor gets the spoils. The sad thing it's really only a 153 years since the start of the Civil War.

    While America's children continue to be brainwashed in believing that Lincoln was the savior of the black man, the congressman from Illinois tells a different tail in his forth debate with Steven Douglas at Charleston Illinois on September 18, 1858. Quote, I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and politically quality of the white and black races. I am not now nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negros. Nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people. And I will say in addition to this, that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And in as much as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior. And I as much as any other men am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.

    The long list of Lincoln's recorded remarks which would readily and fervently be condemns as racist hate speech today, includes his views on the expansion of slavery. Lincoln wrote " There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation, that is mixture of the white and black races. A separation of the races is the only perfect preventative of amalgamation. But as the immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together. if white and black people never get together in Kansas, they will never mix blood in Kansas.

    On interracial marriage Lincoln said, "Our republican system was meant for homogeneous people. As long as black continue to live with the whites, they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of breeds bastards may someday challenge the supremacy of the white men."

    "All Rights Reserved"

  • Alberto Gutier

    Alberto Gutier Arizona

    There is a distinct difference between the “United States” and America. In the United States everything is “illegal” America however is the land of the “free”

    There is a distinct difference between the “United States” and America. In the United States everything is “illegal”
    America however is the land of the “free”

  • Tyisha Walker

    Tyisha Walker Connecticut

    "There's a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office I intend to expose this plot." John F Kennedy

    "There's a plot in this country to enslave every man, woman and child. Before I leave this high and noble office I intend to expose this plot." John F Kennedy

  • Salome Peters

    Salome Peters Maryland

    On June 13 1967 United States Representative Rarick of Louisiana submitted to the United States Congress , Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution urging the Congress to declare the 14th amendment illegal. He also entered a treatise on the illegality of the 14th amendment prepared by a Louisiana Judge Leander H. Perez

    On June 13 1967 United States Representative Rarick of Louisiana submitted to the United States Congress , Louisiana House Concurrent Resolution urging the Congress to declare the 14th amendment illegal. He also entered a treatise on the illegality of the 14th amendment prepared by a Louisiana Judge Leander H. Perez

  • Marlene Prieto

    Marlene Prieto New Jersey

    The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. "Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know." John F Kennedy April 27, 1961 All Rights Reserved

    The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. "Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know." John F Kennedy
    April 27, 1961

    All Rights Reserved

  • Glenn McCall

    Glenn McCall South Carolina

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment July 27th 1868

    All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
    Section 1 of the 14th Amendment July 27th 1868

  • Ruben Diaz Jr

    Ruben Diaz Jr New York

    I'm starting to think this game has been played for a long time now. Albeit there is beauty in the illusion. I really want to gather my thoughts before I comment as this is a sensitive subject. What I do want to say is this blog reminded me of a scene at the end of the movie Killing Em Softly where Brad Pitts character says "Americas not a country, it's a business."

    I'm starting to think this game has been played for a long time now. Albeit there is beauty in the illusion. I really want to gather my thoughts before I comment as this is a sensitive subject. What I do want to say is this blog reminded me of a scene at the end of the movie Killing Em Softly where Brad Pitts character says "Americas not a country, it's a business."

  • Tom Lawless

    Tom Lawless Tennessee

    "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen where private corporate commercial paper(Federal Reserve Notes) and securities(checks) is concerned. For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. " Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942

    "Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation, and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen where private corporate commercial paper(Federal Reserve Notes) and securities(checks) is concerned. For purposes of suit, such corporations and individuals are regarded as entities entirely separate from government. "

    Supreme Court Annotated Statute, Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States 318 U.S. 363-371 1942

  • Janice Bond

    Janice Bond Hawaii

    "The 14th Amendment did not alter the status of free white persons, as previously existing.” Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U.S. 313, 25 L. ed. 667, 3 Am. Crim. Rep. 524;

    "The 14th Amendment did not alter the status of free white persons, as previously existing.” Virginia v. Rivers, 100 U.S. 313, 25 L. ed. 667, 3 Am. Crim. Rep. 524;

  • Silvana Taberes

    Silvana Taberes Illionois

    The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t actually free all of the slaves. Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln also exempted selected areas of the Confederacy that had already come under Union control in hopes of gaining the loyalty of whites in those states. In practice, then, the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t immediately free a single slave, as the only places it applied were places where the federal government had no control—the Southern states currently fighting against the Union.

    The Emancipation Proclamation didn’t actually free all of the slaves. Since Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a military measure, it didn’t apply to border slave states like Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky and Missouri, all of which had remained loyal to the Union. Lincoln also exempted selected areas of the Confederacy that had already come under Union control in hopes of gaining the loyalty of whites in those states.

    In practice, then, the Emancipation Proclamation didn’t immediately free a single slave, as the only places it applied were places where the federal government had no control—the Southern states currently fighting against the Union.

  • Garrett C. Monti

    Garrett C. Monti Louisiana

    One thing about Donald Trump is that he’s honest to a fault. As far as the “United States” being a “business” I don’t think it’s any more evident than having Donald J Trump as the CEO. He is the CEO right??? #45

    One thing about Donald Trump is that he’s honest to a fault. As far as the “United States” being a “business” I don’t think it’s any more evident than having Donald J Trump as the CEO.
    He is the CEO right??? #45

  • Carole Joyce

    Carole Joyce Arizona

    The Constitution for the United States of America temporarily ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and the Courts unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the nation in their own image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the nation under the new form of control. Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the Constitution ceased to exist. President Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President on April 15, 1861, Executive Order 1, and the nation has been ruled by the President under executive order ever since. When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander ­in­ Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that national emergency declared by President Lincoln.

    The Constitution for the United States of America temporarily ceased to be the law of the land, and the President, Congress, and the Courts unlawfully presumed that they were free to remake the nation in their own image, whereas, lawfully, no constitutional provisions were in place which afforded power to any of the actions which were taken which presumed to place the nation under the new form of control.

    Southern states, by virtue of their secession from the Union, also ceased to exist sine die, and some state legislatures in the Northern bloc also adjourned sine die, and thus, all the states which were parties to creating the Constitution ceased to exist. President Lincoln executed the first executive order written by any President on April 15, 1861, Executive Order 1, and the nation has been ruled by the President under executive order ever since.

    When Congress eventually did reconvene, it was reconvened under the military authority of the Commander ­in­ Chief and not by Rules of Order for Parliamentary bodies or by Constitutional Law; placing the American people under martial rule ever since that national emergency declared by President Lincoln.

  • Celine Purcell

    Celine Purcell California

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment X 1791

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment X 1791

  • Andres Ramos

    Andres Ramos California

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

    A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed

  • Jared Sutton

    Jared Sutton Colorado

    Yo Ruben Diaz. The full quote for the referenced scene is as follows "My friend, Thomas Jefferson is an American saint because he wrote the words 'All men are created equal', words he clearly didn't believe since he allowed his own children to live in slavery. He's a rich white snob who's sick of paying taxes to the Brits. So, yeah, he writes some lovely words and aroused the rabble and they went and died for those words while he sat back and drank his wine and fucked his slave girl. This guy wants to tell me we're living in a community? Don't make me laugh. I'm living in America, and in America you're on your own. America's not a country. It's just a business. NOW FUCK YOU PAY ME. "

    Yo Ruben Diaz. The full quote for the referenced scene is as follows

    "My friend, Thomas Jefferson is an American saint because he wrote the words 'All men are created equal', words he clearly didn't believe since he allowed his own children to live in slavery. He's a rich white snob who's sick of paying taxes to the Brits. So, yeah, he writes some lovely words and aroused the rabble and they went and died for those words while he sat back and drank his wine and fucked his slave girl. This guy wants to tell me we're living in a community? Don't make me laugh. I'm living in America, and in America you're on your own. America's not a country. It's just a business. NOW FUCK YOU PAY ME. "

  • Flint Taylor

    Flint Taylor Illinois

    Treasury Secretary Jack Lew announced its the 7th President of the United States Andrew Jackson who loses his spot on the front of the $20 bill. He will be replaced by Harriet Tubman. The Civil War anti slavery activist and a leader of the Underground Railroad.

    Treasury Secretary Jack Lew announced its the 7th President of the United States Andrew Jackson who loses his spot on the front of the $20 bill. He will be replaced by Harriet Tubman. The Civil War anti slavery activist and a leader of the Underground Railroad.

  • Robert Muller

    Robert Muller North Carolina

    So it’s 2018 at the moment but it might as well be the 18th century. “What about Thomas Jefferson you like him because he was a major slave owner.” So is Donald Trump racist??? How can one tell. On one end there’s racist people. On the opposite end there’s racist polices

    So it’s 2018 at the moment but it might as well be the 18th century.

    “What about Thomas Jefferson you like him because he was a major slave owner.”

    So is Donald Trump racist??? How can one tell. On one end there’s racist people. On the opposite end there’s racist polices

  • Christopher Gleason

    Christopher Gleason Pennsylvania

    “The United States is home to 5% of the world’s population, but 25% of the world’s prisoners. Think about that.”-Barack Obama

    “The United States is home to 5% of the world’s population, but 25% of the world’s prisoners. Think about that.”-Barack Obama

  • Levi Guerra

    Levi Guerra Washington

    “One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.” Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

    “One hundred years later, the Negro is still languishing in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land. So we have come here today to dramatize a shameful condition.”
    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

  • Art Sisneros

    Art Sisneros Texas

    Dred Scott v Sanford (1856) 60 U.S. 393, 15 L. Ed. 691, 1856 U.S. 19 HOW 393. Facts. Dred Scott (Plaintiff) was a slave living in the slave state of Missouri. His owner took him to Illinois and then to Minnesota, which were both free states under the Missouri Compromise. Plaintiff and his owner returned to Missouri, and Plaintiff was sold to Sanford (Defendant). Plaintiff sued Defendant for his freedom, claiming to be a citizen of Missouri, based on having obtained freedom by domicile for a long period in a free state. Issue. Can a slave be considered a citizen and as such become entitled to all the rights, privileges and immunities granted to citizens under the United States Constitution Decision. Slaves were not intended to be included under the word ‘citizens’ in the Constitution. At the time the Constitution was written, slaves were considered an inferior and subordinate class. No state can introduce a new member into the political community created by the Constitution. The Declaration of Independence clearly never intended to include slaves.The Constitution never intended to confer on slaves or their posterity the blessings of liberty, or any of the personal rights so carefully provided for the citizen. Plaintiff is clearly not a citizen and not entitled to sue.

    Dred Scott v Sanford (1856) 60 U.S. 393, 15 L. Ed. 691, 1856 U.S. 19 HOW 393.

    Facts. Dred Scott (Plaintiff) was a slave living in the slave state of Missouri. His
    owner took him to Illinois and then to Minnesota, which were both free states under the Missouri Compromise. Plaintiff and his owner returned to Missouri, and Plaintiff was sold to Sanford (Defendant). Plaintiff sued Defendant for his freedom, claiming to be a citizen of Missouri, based on having obtained freedom by domicile for a long period in a free state.

    Issue. Can a slave be considered a citizen and as such become entitled to all the rights, privileges and immunities granted to citizens under the United States Constitution

    Decision. Slaves were not intended to be included under the word ‘citizens’ in the
    Constitution. At the time the Constitution was written, slaves were considered an inferior and subordinate class. No state can introduce a new member into the political community created by the Constitution.

    The Declaration of Independence clearly never intended to include slaves.The Constitution never intended to confer on slaves or their posterity the blessings of liberty, or any of the personal rights so carefully provided for the citizen. Plaintiff is clearly not a citizen and not entitled to sue.

  • Bruce Ash

    Bruce Ash Arizona

    Christopher Gleason It’s funny Barack Obama is on record for that quote as he is a “constitutional lawyer” whatever that means. You don’t think he knows exactly why 25% of prisoners are in the “United States”

    Christopher Gleason

    It’s funny Barack Obama is on record for that quote as he is a “constitutional lawyer” whatever that means. You don’t think he knows exactly why 25% of prisoners are in the “United States”

  • James Donahue

    James Donahue California

    I can't help but back a group using music to spread a good message. So much of rap today isn't about stopping the real issues but hindering the lives of millions. This music is different. You guys, keep doing what you do. Your music is the voice of the voiceless and it will be heard.

    I can't help but back a group using music to spread a good message. So much of rap today isn't about stopping the real issues but hindering the lives of millions. This music is different. You guys, keep doing what you do. Your music is the voice of the voiceless and it will be heard.

  • Brian Ballard

    Brian Ballard Florida

    [quote=Garrett C. Monti] One thing about Donald Trump is that he’s honest to a fault. As far as the “United States” being a “business” I don’t think it’s any more evident than having Donald J Trump as the CEO. He is the CEO right??? #45 [/quote] Dude I have said this for years and no one listens. America isn't a land of freedom, it is a business and each and every one of us are products of that business. What happens to a bad product in a business? Do they fix it or just dispose of it? Think about that. We need to take a stand. We are not disposable.

    Garrett C. Monti wrote:

    One thing about Donald Trump is that he’s honest to a fault. As far as the “United States” being a “business” I don’t think it’s any more evident than having Donald J Trump as the CEO.
    He is the CEO right??? #45

    Dude I have said this for years and no one listens. America isn't a land of freedom, it is a business and each and every one of us are products of that business. What happens to a bad product in a business? Do they fix it or just dispose of it? Think about that. We need to take a stand. We are not disposable.

  • Karen Britto

    Karen Britto Maryland

    [quote=Kelly Mitchell] Much respect to the legend Malcolm X. And he is right to an extent However as a "person of color" I will claim to be American. Not African American not black but American. In fact since we dropping gems dig this -----> AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America. [/quote] We all need to do this. If you were born in the US you are an American. You own that right and that freedom and don't let people with labels, lies, or statistics take that away. So many people are quick these days to make everything about race and look where that has gotten us. We are all humans who live in America and we need to start treating each other as such. We can't change the past but we damn sure can write our future!

    Kelly Mitchell wrote:

    Much respect to the legend Malcolm X. And he is right to an extent However as a "person of color" I will claim to be American. Not African American not black but American. In fact since we dropping gems dig this ----->

    AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.

    We all need to do this. If you were born in the US you are an American. You own that right and that freedom and don't let people with labels, lies, or statistics take that away. So many people are quick these days to make everything about race and look where that has gotten us. We are all humans who live in America and we need to start treating each other as such. We can't change the past but we damn sure can write our future!

  • Parwez Wahid

    Parwez Wahid Massachusetts

    I grew up on hip hop and it is rare these days to see a group who believes in something and stands for it. I have not heard many lyrics since the mid 90's that voiced such a strong message. Not of just a political stand but a mental and emotional one. I am sharing this 10 fold. Don't let them stop you now!

    I grew up on hip hop and it is rare these days to see a group who believes in something and stands for it. I have not heard many lyrics since the mid 90's that voiced such a strong message. Not of just a political stand but a mental and emotional one. I am sharing this 10 fold. Don't let them stop you now!

  • Robert Duncan

    Robert Duncan Kentucky

    [quote=Alberto Gutier] There is a distinct difference between the “United States” and America. In the United States everything is “illegal” America however is the land of the “free” [/quote] The United States is the business. Fat cats in their fat suites running their fat corporation. As an American born and raised, I say we take back this land. It may not have been handled the right way all them years ago with the Natives but we can change that. We can be the change. This music is inspiration we all need to learn from. My land doesn't own me, my land doesn't owe me. I am a free American.

    Alberto Gutier wrote:

    There is a distinct difference between the “United States” and America. In the United States everything is “illegal”
    America however is the land of the “free”

    The United States is the business. Fat cats in their fat suites running their fat corporation. As an American born and raised, I say we take back this land. It may not have been handled the right way all them years ago with the Natives but we can change that. We can be the change. This music is inspiration we all need to learn from. My land doesn't own me, my land doesn't owe me. I am a free American.

  • Lorraine Spradling

    Lorraine Spradling New Mexico

    There are so many powerful messages in just these 4 minutes. I am going to have to listen again, and again. This is an amazing song. Not just a song but a powerful statement. You guys have guts, heart, and are not afraid to speak against the government and the wrongdoings of this nation and I commend that!

    There are so many powerful messages in just these 4 minutes. I am going to have to listen again, and again. This is an amazing song. Not just a song but a powerful statement. You guys have guts, heart, and are not afraid to speak against the government and the wrongdoings of this nation and I commend that!

  • Michael Neil McNeely

    Michael Neil McNeely Georgia

    [quote=Parwez Wahid] I grew up on hip hop and it is rare these days to see a group who believes in something and stands for it. I have not heard many lyrics since the mid 90's that voiced such a strong message. Not of just a political stand but a mental and emotional one. I am sharing this 10 fold. Don't let them stop you now! [/quote] The music is out there, it has just become harder and harder to find. A friend of mine I met on a gaming forum introduced me to YNR and I have been hooked since. The music is powerful and with this All Rights Reserved song, the more people who hear it the more they will think. Music is a powerful tool and it can be used for us for against us.

    Parwez Wahid wrote:

    I grew up on hip hop and it is rare these days to see a group who believes in something and stands for it. I have not heard many lyrics since the mid 90's that voiced such a strong message. Not of just a political stand but a mental and emotional one. I am sharing this 10 fold. Don't let them stop you now!

    The music is out there, it has just become harder and harder to find. A friend of mine I met on a gaming forum introduced me to YNR and I have been hooked since. The music is powerful and with this All Rights Reserved song, the more people who hear it the more they will think. Music is a powerful tool and it can be used for us for against us.

  • Mike Moberley

    Mike Moberley Florida

    With all the hell being raised in America right now, this is what we need. A powerful stand, a voice, lyrics no one can ignore. I have not felt such a powerful rush from a song in a long time. The recordings played throughout the song have an impact and I can only hope many others hear this too.

    With all the hell being raised in America right now, this is what we need. A powerful stand, a voice, lyrics no one can ignore. I have not felt such a powerful rush from a song in a long time. The recordings played throughout the song have an impact and I can only hope many others hear this too.

  • Melissa Juett Kalka

    Melissa Juett Kalka Texas

    [quote=Ruben Diaz Jr] I'm starting to think this game has been played for a long time now. Albeit there is beauty in the illusion. I really want to gather my thoughts before I comment as this is a sensitive subject. What I do want to say is this blog reminded me of a scene at the end of the movie Killing Em Softly where Brad Pitts character says "Americas not a country, it's a business." [/quote] Oh for sure. Music like this makes you think. It then makes you research and consider things. What was once considered a "conspiracy" may very well be the stone cold truth. We are allowing a corporation to run our lives. How free our we when we are on the streets killing each other? Living off the government? This is what they want. This is what they have always wanted. It is sickening.

    Ruben Diaz Jr wrote:

    I'm starting to think this game has been played for a long time now. Albeit there is beauty in the illusion. I really want to gather my thoughts before I comment as this is a sensitive subject. What I do want to say is this blog reminded me of a scene at the end of the movie Killing Em Softly where Brad Pitts character says "Americas not a country, it's a business."

    Oh for sure. Music like this makes you think. It then makes you research and consider things. What was once considered a "conspiracy" may very well be the stone cold truth. We are allowing a corporation to run our lives. How free our we when we are on the streets killing each other? Living off the government? This is what they want. This is what they have always wanted. It is sickening.

  • Andrew Reilly

    Andrew Reilly Pennsylvania

    I will be honest, I had never heard of Young N Reckless until just a bit ago. Someone mentioned a song on Twitter I follow and I asked, I was redirected here. I have listened to All Rights Reserved several times before actually commenting. I am blown away by the talent but more so by the message. They say God gives each and every one of us a gift and it is our choice to either use it to spread the truth and help others or use it to further divide and destroy humanity.

    I will be honest, I had never heard of Young N Reckless until just a bit ago. Someone mentioned a song on Twitter I follow and I asked, I was redirected here. I have listened to All Rights Reserved several times before actually commenting. I am blown away by the talent but more so by the message. They say God gives each and every one of us a gift and it is our choice to either use it to spread the truth and help others or use it to further divide and destroy humanity.

  • Mark Olbert

    Mark Olbert California

    Malfeasance (mal-fee-zents), A wrongful or unlawful act; esp., wrongdoing or misconduct by a public official; <——- How many “public officials” does this apply to??? (Don’t worry I won’t wait) How about one more.... Malum prohibition (mal-эm prob-hib-i-tэm), [Latin “ prohibited evil”] An act that is s crime merely because it is prohibited by statute, although the act itself is not necessarily immoral. Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

    Malfeasance (mal-fee-zents), A wrongful or unlawful act; esp., wrongdoing or misconduct by a public official; <——- How many “public officials” does this apply to??? (Don’t worry I won’t wait)

    How about one more....

    Malum prohibition (mal-эm prob-hib-i-tэm), [Latin “ prohibited evil”] An act that is s crime merely because it is prohibited by statute, although the act itself is not necessarily immoral.

    Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition.

  • Jack Evans

    Jack Evans Washington DC

    “Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” Colonel Edward Mandell House This was said in 1913. We are now in 2018 people.. All Rights Reserved

    “Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will effect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions.

    Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.” Colonel Edward Mandell House

    This was said in 1913. We are now in 2018 people..

    All Rights Reserved

  • John Falconetti

    John Falconetti Florida

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. Amendment V 1791 December 15th

    No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

    Amendment V 1791 December 15th

  • Will Sellers

    Will Sellers Alabama

    H. RES. 194 In the House of Representatives, U. S., July 29, 2008 RESOLUTION Whereas millions of Indigenous Americans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and the 13 American colonies from 1619 through 1865; Whereas slavery in America resembled no other form of involuntary servitude known in history, as Indigenous Americans were captured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or animals; Whereas Indigenous Americans forced into slavery were brutalized, humiliated, dehumanized, and subjected to the indignity of being stripped of their names and heritage; Whereas enslaved families were torn apart after having been sold separately from one another;

    H. RES. 194

    In the House of Representatives, U. S.,
    July 29, 2008

    RESOLUTION
    Whereas millions of Indigenous Americans and their descendants were enslaved in the United States and the 13 American colonies from 1619 through 1865;
    Whereas slavery in America resembled no other form of involuntary servitude known in history, as Indigenous Americans were captured and sold at auction like inanimate objects or animals;

    Whereas Indigenous Americans forced into slavery were brutalized, humiliated,
    dehumanized, and subjected to the indignity of being stripped of their names and
    heritage;

    Whereas enslaved families were torn apart
    after having been sold separately from one
    another;

  • Dena DeCamp

    Dena DeCamp Florida

    On March 9, 1933, House Joint Resolution No. 192-10 by the 73rd Congress, was voted into law, which is the Emergency Banking Act.  This Act declared the Treasury of the United States, ‘Bankrupt’

    On March 9, 1933, House Joint Resolution No. 192-10 by the 73rd Congress, was voted into law, which is the Emergency Banking Act.  This Act declared the Treasury of the United States, ‘Bankrupt’

  • Nury Martinez

    Nury Martinez California

    Whereas, on March 6, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, by Proclamation declared the existence of a national emergency and proclaimed a bank holiday extending from Monday the 6th day of March to Thursday the 9th day of March, 1933, both dates inclusive, in order to prevent the export, hoarding or earmarking of gold or silver coin, or bullion or currency, or speculation in foreign exchange; and Whereas, under the Act of March 9, 1933, all Proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President pursuant to the authority conferred by section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are approved and confirmed; and Whereas, said national emergency still continues, and it is necessary to take further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933, in order to accomplish such purposes: Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, in view of such continuing national emergency and by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended by the Act of March 9, 1933, do hereby proclaim, order, direct and declare that all the terms and provisions of said Proclamation of March 6, 1933, and the regulations and orders issued thereunder are hereby continued in full force and effect until further proclamation by the President. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the seal of the United States to be affixed. Done in the District of Columbia, this 9th day of March, in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty three, and of the Independence of the United States the One Hundredth and Fifty-seventh.

    Whereas, on March 6, 1933, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, by Proclamation declared the existence of a national emergency and proclaimed a bank holiday extending from Monday the 6th day of March to Thursday the 9th day of March, 1933, both dates inclusive, in order to prevent the export, hoarding or earmarking of gold or silver coin, or bullion or currency, or speculation in foreign exchange; and

    Whereas, under the Act of March 9, 1933, all Proclamations heretofore or hereafter issued by the President pursuant to the authority conferred by section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, are approved and confirmed; and

    Whereas, said national emergency still continues, and it is necessary to take further measures extending beyond March 9, 1933, in order to accomplish such purposes:

    Now, Therefore, I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, in view of such continuing national emergency and by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5 (b) of the Act of October 6, 1917 (40 Stat. L. 411), as amended by the Act of March 9, 1933, do hereby proclaim, order, direct and declare that all the terms and provisions of said Proclamation of March 6, 1933, and the regulations and orders issued thereunder are hereby continued in full force and effect until further proclamation by the President.

    In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and have caused the seal of the United States to be affixed.

    Done in the District of Columbia, this 9th day of March, in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty three, and of the Independence of the United States the One Hundredth and Fifty-seventh.

  • Andrea Arterburn

    Andrea Arterburn North Carolina

    “Tonight sitting at my desk in the White House, I make my first radio report to the people in my second term of office. I am reminded of that evening in March, four years ago, when I made my first radio report to you. We edge then in the midst of the great banking crisis. Soon after, with the authority of the Congress, we asked the Nation to turn over all of its privately held gold, dollar for dollar, to the Government of the United States. Franklin D Roosevelt March 9th 1937

    “Tonight sitting at my desk in the White House, I make my first radio report to the people in my second term of office. I am reminded of that evening in March, four years ago, when I made my first radio report to you. We edge then in the midst of the great banking crisis. Soon after, with the authority of the Congress, we asked the Nation to turn over all of its privately held gold, dollar for dollar, to the Government of the United States.

    Franklin D Roosevelt
    March 9th 1937

  • Perry Hooper Jr

    Perry Hooper Jr Alabama

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

  • Stephanie Beckley

    Stephanie Beckley Indiana

    Congress has specified that a Federal Reserve Bank must hold collateral equal in value to the Federal Reserve notes that the Bank receives. This collateral is chiefly gold certificates and United States securities. This provides backing for the note issue. The idea was that if the Congress dissolved the Federal Reserve System, the United States would take over the notes (liabilities). This would meet the requirements of Section 411, but the government would also take over the assets, which would be of equal value. Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them. Federal Reserve Banks obtain the notes from our Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). It pays the BEP for the cost of producing the notes, which then become liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks, and obligations of the United States Government.

    Congress has specified that a Federal Reserve Bank must hold collateral equal in value to the Federal Reserve notes that the Bank receives. This collateral is chiefly gold certificates and United States securities. This provides backing for the note issue. The idea was that if the Congress dissolved the Federal Reserve System, the United States would take over the notes (liabilities). This would meet the requirements of Section 411, but the government would also take over the assets, which would be of equal value. Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them.

    Federal Reserve Banks obtain the notes from our Bureau of Engraving and Printing (BEP). It pays the BEP for the cost of producing the notes, which then become liabilities of the Federal Reserve Banks, and obligations of the United States Government.

  • Sandra Aduna

    Sandra Aduna California

    The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.  The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.  The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created. California Code, Government Code - GOV § 11120

    The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them.  The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know.  The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.

    California Code, Government Code - GOV § 11120

  • Donna Smith

    Donna Smith Massachusetts

    31 USC 5115 United States currency notes (a) The Secretary of the Treasury may issue United States currency notes. The notes 1) are payable to bearer; and (2) shall be in a form and in denominations of at least one dollar that the Secretary prescribes. (b) The amount of United States currency notes outstanding and in circulation— (1) may not be more than $300,000,000; and (2) may not be held or used for a reserve. (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 983

    31 USC 5115 United States currency notes

    (a) The Secretary of the Treasury may issue United States currency notes.

    The notes
    1) are payable to bearer; and
    (2) shall be in a form and in denominations of at least one dollar that the Secretary prescribes.
    (b) The amount of United States currency notes outstanding and in circulation—
    (1) may not be more than $300,000,000; and (2) may not be held or used for a reserve.
    (Pub. L. 97–258, Sept. 13, 1982, 96 Stat. 983

  • Grady Thornton

    Grady Thornton Alabama

    Andrew Jackson, has been featured on the front side of the bill since 1928. The hypocrisy of America is evident. It has been 90 years this belligerent has been the face of the $20 bill and he and his legacy are still celebrated. I'm all for Young N Reckless and the message they represent. Viva La Revolution

    Andrew Jackson, has been featured on the front side of the bill since 1928. The hypocrisy of America is evident. It has been 90 years this belligerent has been the face of the $20 bill and he and his legacy are still celebrated.

    I'm all for Young N Reckless and the message they represent.

    Viva La Revolution

  • William J Clinton

    William J Clinton New York

    Executive Order 13037 March 3rd 1997 (b) The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting; including use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; ownership by the Federal Government or some other entity: defense and non defense capital: physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinctions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to increase productivity and capital to enhance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting;

    Executive Order 13037 March 3rd 1997

    (b) The appropriate definition of capital for Federal budgeting; including use of capital for the Federal Government itself or the economy at large; ownership by the Federal Government or some other entity: defense and non defense capital: physical capital and intangible or human capital; distinctions among investments in and for current, future, and retired workers; distinctions between capital to increase productivity and capital to enhance the quality of life; and existing definitions of capital for budgeting;

  • John Bickle

    John Bickle Hawaii

    Article I Section II 3) Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of Free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term Of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

    Article I Section II
    3) Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of Free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term Of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

  • Jennifer Locke

    Jennifer Locke Idaho

    Registered Corporation. A publicly held corporation, a security of which is registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934. The corporation is subject to the Acts periodic disclosure requirements and proxy regulations. 15 USCA 780

    Registered Corporation. A publicly held corporation, a security of which is registered under section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act Of 1934. The corporation is subject to the Acts periodic disclosure requirements and proxy regulations. 15 USCA 780

  • Helen Van Etten

    Helen Van Etten Kansas

    The Gold Reserve Act outlawed most private possession of gold, forcing individuals to sell it to the Treasury, after which it was stored in United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox and other locations. The act also changed the nominal price of gold from $20.67 per troy ounce to $35. This price change incentivized foreign investors to export their gold to the United States, while simultaneously devaluing the U.S. dollar in an attempt to spark inflation. The increase in gold reserves due to the price change as well as the confiscation clause resulted in a large accumulation of gold in the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury. The increase in the money supply lowered real interest rates which increased investment in durable goods. A year earlier, in 1933, Executive Order 6102 had made it a criminal offense for U.S. citizens to own or trade gold anywhere in the world, with exceptions for some jewelry and collector's coins. These prohibitions were relaxed starting in 1964 – gold certificates were again allowed for private investors on April 24, 1964, although the obligation to pay the certificate holder on demand in gold specie would not be honored. By 1975 Americans could again freely own and trade gold.

    The Gold Reserve Act outlawed most private possession of gold, forcing individuals to sell it to the Treasury, after which it was stored in United States Bullion Depository at Fort Knox and other locations. The act also changed the nominal price of gold from $20.67 per troy ounce to $35. This price change incentivized foreign investors to export their gold to the United States, while simultaneously devaluing the U.S. dollar in an attempt to spark inflation. The increase in gold reserves due to the price change as well as the confiscation clause resulted in a large accumulation of gold in the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury. The increase in the money supply lowered real interest rates which increased investment in durable goods.

    A year earlier, in 1933, Executive Order 6102 had made it a criminal offense for U.S. citizens to own or trade gold anywhere in the world, with exceptions for some jewelry and collector's coins. These prohibitions were relaxed starting in 1964 – gold certificates were again allowed for private investors on April 24, 1964, although the obligation to pay the certificate holder on demand in gold specie would not be honored. By 1975 Americans could again freely own and trade gold.

  • Lott Harris Dill

    Lott Harris Dill Georgia

    On June 5th 1933, The U.S. Congress abrogated the “gold standard” in Joint Resolution 192, 48 Stat. 112, which formally required that obligations of the United States would be exchanger by the Department of the Treasury by gold or silver coins of the same denomination, and replaced it with the current standard which provides that obligations “shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. The law, which was affirmed as constitutional by the U. S. Supreme Court in Norman v. Baltimore &amp; O.R. Co., 294 U.S. 240 (U.S. 1935), effectively permits U.S. currency to “float” with the exchange rates of other nations, because the currency is valued whatever someone is willing to pay for it, either in other currency or in goods or service.

    On June 5th 1933, The U.S. Congress abrogated the “gold standard” in Joint Resolution 192, 48 Stat. 112, which formally required that obligations of the United States would be exchanger by the Department of the Treasury by gold or silver coins of the same denomination, and replaced it with the current standard which provides that obligations “shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts.

    The law, which was affirmed as constitutional by the U. S. Supreme Court in Norman v. Baltimore & O.R. Co., 294 U.S. 240 (U.S. 1935), effectively permits U.S. currency to “float” with the exchange rates of other nations, because the currency is valued whatever someone is willing to pay for it, either in other currency or in goods or service.

  • Hagner Mister

    Hagner Mister Maryland

    President, Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated that: "A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides."

    President, Dwight David Eisenhower, by Executive Order No.10834, signed on August 21, 1959 and printed in the Federal Register at 24 F.R. 6865, pursuant to law, stated that: "A military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a yellow fringe border on three sides."

  • Franklin Garcia

    Franklin Garcia Washington DC

    It is an established fact that the the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act March 9 1933, 48 Stat 1 Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt being bankrupt and insolvent, H.J.R 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933- Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exist today in name only. " United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1933 Vol 33,

    It is an established fact that the the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act March 9 1933, 48 Stat 1 Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt being bankrupt and insolvent, H.J.R 192, 73rd Congress in session June 5, 1933- Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exist today in name only. "

    United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1933 Vol 33,

  • Margaret Ferraro

    Margaret Ferraro Pennsylvania

    "Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE- The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a mans condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. "

    "Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE- The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a mans condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights. "

  • Landon Estay

    Landon Estay Texas

    "When one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth." State v Coddington, 662 P 2d 155, 135 Ariz. 480. (1983)

    "When one conveys a false impression by disclosure of some facts and the concealment of others, such concealment is in effect a false representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth."

    State v Coddington, 662 P 2d 155, 135 Ariz. 480. (1983)

  • Bob Cusanelli

    Bob Cusanelli Alabama

    "Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading... We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately" U.S. v. Tweel 550 F2d 297, 299-300.

    "Silence can only be equated with fraud when there is a legal or moral duty to speak, or when an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading... We cannot condone this shocking conduct... If that is the case we hope our message is clear. This sort of deception will not be tolerated and if this is routine it should be corrected immediately"

    U.S. v. Tweel 550 F2d 297, 299-300.

  • Robin Bernstein

    Robin Bernstein Florida

    "[A] person accused of crime has a twofold protection, in the court and the jury, against being unlawfully convicted. If the evidence appears to the court to be insufficient in law to warrant a conviction, the court may direct an acquittal...But the court can never order the jury to convict; for no one can be found guilty, but by the judgment of his peers." From the dissent by Gray and Shiras, Supreme Court, Sparf and Hansen v. U.S., 156 U.S. 51, 174 (1894)

    "[A] person accused of crime has a twofold protection, in the court and the jury, against being unlawfully convicted. If the evidence appears to the court to be insufficient in law to warrant a conviction, the court may direct an acquittal...But the court can never order the jury to convict; for no one can be found guilty, but by the judgment of his peers."

    From the dissent by Gray and Shiras, Supreme Court, Sparf and Hansen v. U.S., 156 U.S. 51, 174 (1894)

  • Sean Parnell

    Sean Parnell Alaska

    De facto court. One established organized and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a statute apparently valid, though such statutes may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged, or a court established and acting under the authority of a de facto government. 1B1 Judges 173. In re Manning 139 U. S. 504 11 S Ct 624 35 L Ed 264; Gildemaster v Lindsay 212 Mich 259, 180 N. W. 633, 635

    De facto court. One established organized and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a statute apparently valid, though such statutes may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged, or a court established and acting under the authority of a de facto government. 1B1 Judges 173. In re Manning 139 U. S. 504 11 S Ct 624 35 L Ed 264; Gildemaster v Lindsay 212 Mich 259, 180 N. W. 633, 635

  • Roxanne Allen

    Roxanne Allen New Mexico

    Privilege from arrest. An exemption from arrest, as That enjoyed by members of Congress during legislative sessions. U.S. Constitution article I subsection 6 c1. 1. All Rights Reserved

    Privilege from arrest. An exemption from arrest, as That enjoyed by members of Congress during legislative sessions. U.S. Constitution article I subsection 6 c1. 1.

    All Rights Reserved

  • Walter Begay

    Walter Begay Arizona

    The practice of law cannot be licensed by any State Schware v Board of Bar Examiners 353 U.S. 232, 238, 239 (1957)

    The practice of law cannot be licensed by any State Schware v Board of Bar Examiners 353 U.S. 232, 238, 239 (1957)

  • Gail Teton-Landis

    Gail Teton-Landis California

    The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides: "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State . . . ." It is well established that the Amendment bars suits not only against the State when it is the named party but also when it is the party in fact. Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974); Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 287 (1885); Cunningham v. Macon &amp; Brunswick R. Co., 109 U.S. 446 (1883). Its applicability "is to be determined not by the mere names of the titular parties but by the essential nature and effect of the proceeding, as it appears from the entire record." Ex parte New York, 256 U.S. 490, 500 (1921). However, since Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), it has been settled that the Eleventh Amendment provides no shield for a state official confronted by a claim that he had deprived another of a federal right under the color of state law. Ex parte Young teaches that when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." Id., at 159-160. (Emphasis supplied.) SCHEUER v. RHODES, (1974) No. 72-914 Argued: December 4, 1973 Decided: April 17, 1974

    The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides: "The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State . . . ." It is well established that the Amendment bars suits not only against the State when it is the named party but also when it is the party in fact. Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651 (1974); Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 287 (1885); Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick R. Co., 109 U.S. 446 (1883). Its applicability "is to be determined not by the mere names of the titular parties but by the essential nature and effect of the proceeding, as it appears from the entire record." Ex parte New York, 256 U.S. 490, 500 (1921).

    However, since Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908), it has been settled that the Eleventh Amendment provides no shield for a state official confronted by a claim that he had deprived another of a federal right under the color of state law. Ex parte Young teaches that when a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he "comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States." Id., at 159-160. (Emphasis supplied.)

    SCHEUER v. RHODES, (1974)
    No. 72-914
    Argued: December 4, 1973 Decided: April 17, 1974

  • Lynn Fuller

    Lynn Fuller Delaware

    Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from the speaking of an untruth. 37 C.J.S., Fraud, § 16d 35a

    Fraud and deceit may arise from silence where there is a duty to speak the truth, as well as from the speaking of an untruth. 37 C.J.S., Fraud, § 16d 35a

  • Benjamin Cardenas

    Benjamin Cardenas California

    “Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, &amp; 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a 'yellow fringe' border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83. Since March 9, 1933; the United States has been in a state of declared National Emergency... Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in s plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens. "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees brought into force by states of National Emergency." In Reg U.S. Senate Report No. 93-549 dated 11/19/73 73 CIS Serial Set S963-2 [607 pages]

    “Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a 'yellow fringe' border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.

    Since March 9, 1933; the United States has been in a state of declared National Emergency... Under the powers delegated by these statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad; institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict travel; and in s plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American citizens.

    "A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying degrees brought into force by states of National Emergency." In Reg U.S. Senate Report No. 93-549 dated 11/19/73 73 CIS Serial Set S963-2 [607 pages]

  • Laphonza Butler

    Laphonza Butler California

    “The citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. “ Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471

    “The citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. “

    Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471

  • Fred Knudson

    Fred Knudson Minnesota

    Under the Civil Rights Act Of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983) , color of law is synonymous with a State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state. Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States

    Under the Civil Rights Act Of 1871 (42 U.S.C.A. Section 1983) , color of law is synonymous with a State Action, which is conduct by an officer that bears a sufficiently close nexus to a state so that the action is treated as though it is by the state.

    Section 242 of Title 18 makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States

  • Amy Drayers

    Amy Drayers Colorado

    Another unarmed man was shot and killed by “police officers” in Sacramento while he was in his grandmothers backyard. 2018 and people of color are still not free and continue to be oppressed. We don’t need Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson or Benjamin Cummings and all these other sell outs to fake care. What we need is action by the people for the people. When will it stop????? This is why I wholeheartedly support Young N Recklews for the message they share. I believe when more “Americans” become aware of the power we inherently possess we will begin to live in abundance. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

    Another unarmed man was shot and killed by “police officers” in Sacramento while he was in his grandmothers backyard. 2018 and people of color are still not free and continue to be oppressed. We don’t need Al Sharpton or Jesse Jackson or Benjamin Cummings and all these other sell outs to fake care. What we need is action by the people for the people.

    When will it stop?????

    This is why I wholeheartedly support Young N Recklews for the message they share. I believe when more “Americans” become aware of the power we inherently possess we will begin to live in abundance.

    ALL
    RIGHTS
    RESERVED

  • Robert Nemanich

    Robert Nemanich Colorado

    Gettysburg Address in 1864, and the Incorporation of District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under the Emergency War Powers Act and the Reconstruction Acts. Then reorganized June 11, 1878 16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62 a " Corporation" with a legislature was established, with all the apparatus of a distinct government created (Incorporated) by (Presidential) Legislative Act, February 21, 1871 Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419

    Gettysburg Address in 1864, and the Incorporation of District of Columbia by (Presidential) Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, under the Emergency War Powers Act and the Reconstruction Acts.

    Then reorganized June 11, 1878
    16 Stat. 419 Chapter 62

    a " Corporation" with a legislature was established, with all the apparatus of a distinct government created (Incorporated) by (Presidential) Legislative Act, February 21, 1871

    Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter 62, page 419

  • Jim Wilson

    Jim Wilson Alabama

    President Lincoln knew that he had no authority to issue any executive order, and thus he commissioned General Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) as a special field code to govern his actions under martial law and which justified the seizure of power, which extended the laws of the District of Columbia, and which fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1718 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of Washington, D.C. and into the several states.General Orders No 100, also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, extended The Laws of War and International Law onto American soil, and the United States government became the presumed conqueror of the people and the land.

    President Lincoln knew that he had no authority to issue any executive order, and thus he commissioned General Orders No. 100 (April 24, 1863) as a special field code to govern his actions under martial law and which justified the seizure of power, which extended the laws of the District of Columbia, and which fictionally implemented the provisions of Article I, Section 8, Clauses 1718 of the Constitution beyond the boundaries of Washington, D.C. and into the several states.General Orders No 100, also called the Lieber Instructions and the Lieber Code, extended The Laws of War and International Law onto American soil, and the United States government became the presumed conqueror of the people and the land.

  • Joshua Kirk Shook

    Joshua Kirk Shook Georgia

    Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. US v Will 449 U.S. 200,216, 101 S Ct 47166L Ed 392, 406 (1980) Cohens v Virginia 19 US 6 Wheat 264, 404 S L ed 257 (1821)

    Whenever a judge acts where he/she does not have jurisdiction to act, the judge is engaged in an act or acts of treason. US v Will 449 U.S. 200,216, 101 S Ct 47166L Ed 392, 406 (1980) Cohens v Virginia 19 US 6 Wheat 264, 404 S L ed 257 (1821)

  • Robert Leonard

    Robert Leonard Maryland

    The Bureau of Internal Revenue aka the Internal Revenue Service(IRS) was never created by any Act of Congress. It is not an agency of the Department of Treasury The only mention of the IRS appears in 31 U.S.C. Section 301-315 stating that the President is authorized to appoint an Assistant general Counsel in the U.S. department of treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS. In the 1979 case Chrysler v brown (441 U.S. 281), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that, after searching back to the Civil War, no organic Act for the IRS could be found. The Guarantee Clause in the Constitution establishes a Federal rule of law (Article IV, Sec. 4). Now what was the cause of the so called American Revolution in the first place??? Oh yeah that's right "NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION."

    The Bureau of Internal Revenue aka the Internal Revenue Service(IRS) was never created by any Act of Congress. It is not an agency of the Department of Treasury The only mention of the IRS appears in 31 U.S.C. Section 301-315 stating that the President is authorized to appoint an Assistant general Counsel in the U.S. department of treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS.

    In the 1979 case Chrysler v brown (441 U.S. 281), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that, after searching back to the Civil War, no organic Act for the IRS could be found. The Guarantee Clause in the Constitution establishes a Federal rule of law (Article IV, Sec. 4).
    Now what was the cause of the so called American Revolution in the first place???

    Oh yeah that's right "NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION."

  • Jim Rhoades

    Jim Rhoades Michigan

    “The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum, (P 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L. Ed. 287) Since a corporation is a fictitious "person" (it can not speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the fictional person, and fictional world in which it exists, to the real world. Upon research I noticed a lot of esquires(attorneys) put out misinformation regarding the "strawman" as if it doesn't exist. I'm sure those aware and enlightened understand the conflict of interest of taking any "legal advice" from a lawyer. Their first duty is to the courts. Remember in law we are looked upon as incompetent wards of the state. STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th. Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, Strawman. STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term "strawman" as: 1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted 2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction. The Strawman can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The Strawman is a "shadow", a go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not to be used. As an example, Donald Joseph Trump is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct. Not Donald Trump or Trump, Donald J. or DONALD JOSEPH TRUMP or TRUMP, DONALD or any other variation. NOTHING, other than Donald Joseph Trump identifies the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man: such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN. All Rights Reserved

    “The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state.” Volume 20: Corpus Juris Secundum, (P 1785: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S.Ct. 1973, 41 L. Ed. 287)

    Since a corporation is a fictitious "person" (it can not speak, see, touch, smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the fictional person, and fictional world in which it exists, to the real world.

    Upon research I noticed a lot of esquires(attorneys) put out misinformation regarding the "strawman" as if it doesn't exist. I'm sure those aware and enlightened understand the conflict of interest of taking any "legal advice" from a lawyer. Their first duty is to the courts. Remember in law we are looked upon as incompetent wards of the state.

    STRAMINEUS HOMO: Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This definition comes from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th. Edition, page 1421. Following the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word, Strawman.

    STRAWMAN: A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction. Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the purposes of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not allowed. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term "strawman" as: 1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted 2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.

    The Strawman can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The Strawman is a "shadow", a go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people in this country have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one step further, the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not to be used. As an example, Donald Joseph Trump is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct. Not Donald Trump or Trump, Donald J. or DONALD JOSEPH TRUMP or TRUMP, DONALD or any other variation. NOTHING, other than Donald Joseph Trump identifies the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a fictitious man: such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.

    All Rights Reserved

  • Edwin Simcox

    Edwin Simcox Indiana

    Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289 AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows: Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended- By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j): (j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption and --Byrevoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof. Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made. John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.

    Executive Order 11110 AMENDMENT OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 10289

    AS AMENDED, RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF CERTAIN FUNCTIONS AFFECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
    By virtue of the authority vested in me by section 301 of title 3 of the United States Code, it is ordered as follows:

    Section 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 19, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended-

    By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):

    (j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12,1933, as amended (31 U.S.C.821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of any outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denomination of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption

    and --Byrevoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.

    Sec. 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.

    John F. Kennedy The White House, June 4, 1963.

  • Jerry Costello

    Jerry Costello Illinois

    “Sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.” Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356, at pg 370

    “Sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts.”

    Yick Wo v Hopkins, 118 US 356, at pg 370

  • Robert Torres

    Robert Torres California

    “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty.... It includes the right in so doing to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. It is not a mere privilege, like the privilege of moving a house in the street, operating a business stand in the street, or transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which the city may permit or prohibit at will.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579.

    “The right of a citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon in the ordinary course of life and business is a common right which he has under his right to enjoy life and liberty.... It includes the right in so doing to use the ordinary and usual conveyances of the day; and under existing modes of travel includes the right to drive a horse drawn carriage or wagon thereon, or to operate an automobile thereon for the usual and ordinary purposes of life and business. It is not a mere privilege, like the privilege of moving a house in the street, operating a business stand in the street, or transporting persons or property for hire along the street, which the city may permit or prohibit at will.”

    Thompson v. Smith, 154 S.E. 579.

  • Debbie Hannifan

    Debbie Hannifan Florida

    My God I've never heard such a profound statement in the form of a song such as All Rights Reserved. I really enjoy how Young N Reckless tend to convey a complex message in a simplistic manner. All one really has to do is listen to the words. In addition I believe the snippets provide insight to the lyrics. “We’ve got to understand history” This is also one of the few if not only record I've felt the need to actually research. I must admit many people that have commented are way more informed than me however I appreciate the discourse. This has been an experience to say the least. I can't wait to see what's next. Keep up the great work guys.

    My God I've never heard such a profound statement in the form of a song such as All Rights Reserved. I really enjoy how Young N Reckless tend to convey a complex message in a simplistic manner. All one really has to do is listen to the words. In addition I believe the snippets provide insight to the lyrics. “We’ve got to understand history”

    This is also one of the few if not only record I've felt the need to actually research. I must admit many people that have commented are way more informed than me however I appreciate the discourse. This has been an experience to say the least. I can't wait to see what's next. Keep up the great work guys.

  • Natalie Fortman

    Natalie Fortman California

    A citizen of the United States is s citizen of the federal government. Kitchens v Steele 112 F Supp 383

    A citizen of the United States is s citizen of the federal government. Kitchens v Steele 112 F Supp 383

  • Michael Hines

    Michael Hines North Carolina

    Good work gentlemen!!! We must all be awaken to understand fully what is being displayed to us all on a daily basics. I have yet to heard the single, however I am familiar with the many sic and origin of the concept. I could be Prouder... Wake them all!!!

    Good work gentlemen!!! We must all be awaken to understand fully what is being displayed to us all on a daily basics. I have yet to heard the single, however I am familiar with the many sic and origin of the concept. I could be Prouder... Wake them all!!!

  • Jonelle Fulmer

    Jonelle Fulmer Arkansas

    Abington v Schempp 374 U.S. 203 (1963) This is the landmark Supreme Court case that removed bibles from schools. For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us. Isaiah 33:22

    Abington v Schempp 374 U.S. 203 (1963)

    This is the landmark Supreme Court case that removed bibles from schools.

    For the LORD is our judge, the LORD is our lawgiver, the LORD is our king; he will save us. Isaiah 33:22

  • David Mulinix

    David Mulinix Hawaii

    "The right to labor or earn one's livelihood in any legitimate field of industry or business is a right of property, and any unlawful or unreasonable interference with or abridgment of such right is an invasion thereof, and a restriction of the liberty of the citizen as guaranteed by the Constitution." Yee Gee v. City and County of San Francisco, 235 Fed. 757, 759.

    "The right to labor or earn one's livelihood in any legitimate field of industry or business is a
    right of property, and any unlawful or unreasonable interference with or abridgment of such
    right is an invasion thereof, and a restriction of the liberty of the citizen as guaranteed by the
    Constitution." Yee Gee v. City and County of San Francisco, 235 Fed. 757, 759.

  • Barbara Gordon

    Barbara Gordon Connecticut

    Penhallow v. Doane‟s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1L Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54) defines governments; “ governments are corporations”. In as much every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. Supreme Court Case of 1795,

    Penhallow v. Doane‟s Administrators (3 U.S. 54; 1L Ed. 57; 3 Dall. 54) defines governments; “ governments are corporations”. In as much every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons.

    Supreme Court Case of 1795,

  • Larry Ahern

    Larry Ahern Florida

    18 U.S.C.A. § 241. Conspiracy against rights If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so securedThey shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death. Currentness Effective: October 11, 1996

    18 U.S.C.A. § 241. Conspiracy against rights

    If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

    If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so securedThey shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

    Currentness Effective: October 11, 1996

  • Robert Graham

    Robert Graham Arizona

    De Facto Court One established, organized and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a astatute apparantly valid, though such statute may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged; or a court established and acting under the autority of a de facto government 1 Bl Judges 173 June Manning 139 U.S 11 S Ct 624 35 LEd 264 Gildemssler v Lindsay 212 Mich 299, 180 N.W 633 635

    De Facto Court One established, organized and exercising its judicial functions under authority of a astatute apparantly valid, though such statute may be in fact unconstitutional and may be afterwards so adjudged; or a court established and acting under the autority of a de facto government 1 Bl Judges 173 June Manning 139 U.S 11 S Ct 624 35 LEd 264 Gildemssler v Lindsay 212 Mich 299, 180 N.W 633 635

  • Jacqueline Tupou

    Jacqueline Tupou Alaska

    The Federal Government took our lawful money out of circulation in 1933 but Congress had to provide the people a remedy. Public Law: "Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112" under HJR 192 is that remedy and in part states that the Federal Government will discharge all of our debts, public and private, dollar for dollar. This has been one of the best kept secrets in this Bankrupt Nation. They took everything including all property and titles to property and left us only with an ability to discharge debt and create money through our signature and they never bothered to tell us We create money when we apply for bank loans with our signature. It is our signature and credit in our ability to work that creates the money of account and this has been the case since 1933. The banks have a monopoly to our credit and for this "service" they charge principal and interest on nonexistent money all the time giving the impression they lent us their money and this is fraud because they never revealed where the money came from. This is true for Credit Card accounts and Mortgages.

    The Federal Government took our lawful money out of circulation in 1933 but Congress had to provide the people a remedy. Public Law: "Chap. 48, 48 Stat. 112" under HJR 192 is that remedy and in part states that the Federal Government will discharge all of our debts, public and private, dollar for dollar. This has been one of the best kept secrets in this Bankrupt Nation.

    They took everything including all property and titles to property and left us only with an ability to discharge debt and create money through our signature and they never bothered to tell us

    We create money when we apply for bank loans with our signature. It is our signature and credit in our ability to work that creates the money of account and this has been the case since 1933. The banks have a monopoly to our credit and for this "service" they charge principal and interest on nonexistent money all the time giving the impression they lent us their money and this is fraud because they never revealed where the money came from. This is true for Credit Card accounts and Mortgages.

  • Jerry Hayden

    Jerry Hayden Arizona

    That, Legal tender under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), Section 1-201(24) (Official Comment); “The referenced Official Comment notes that the definition of money is not limited to legal tender under the U.C.C. The test adopted is that of sanction of government, whether by authorization before issue of adoption afterward, which recognizes the circulating medium as a part of the official currency of that government. The narrow view that money is limited to legal tender is rejected. “ Under HJR 192 June 05, 1933 and validated in Perry above the nation is bankrupt and to support the bankruptcy my signature as a man created the currency of the realm for the transaction making me the Creditor. The existing state of emergency is verified ~Title 12 § 95, 95a, 95b and 411 Should this be doubted then these two quotes (of many more) verify the truth… since the principal part of any thing is the beginning. Maxim of Law. It's been over a 100 years and this "statute' is still enacted. Its high time that We The People wake up!!! Trading With The Enemy Act October 6th 1917 Statutes at Large‎: ‎40 Stat. 411

    That, Legal tender under the Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.), Section 1-201(24) (Official Comment); “The referenced Official Comment notes that the definition of money is not limited to legal tender under the U.C.C. The test adopted is that of sanction of government, whether by authorization before issue of adoption afterward, which recognizes the circulating medium as a part of the official currency of that government. The narrow view that money is limited to legal tender is rejected. “

    Under HJR 192 June 05, 1933 and validated in Perry above the nation is bankrupt and to support the bankruptcy my signature as a man created the currency of the realm for the transaction making me the Creditor. The existing state of emergency is verified ~Title 12 § 95, 95a, 95b and 411 Should this be doubted then these two quotes (of many more) verify the truth… since the principal part of any thing is the beginning. Maxim of Law.

    It's been over a 100 years and this "statute' is still enacted. Its high time that We The People wake up!!!

    Trading With The Enemy Act October 6th 1917
    Statutes at Large‎: ‎40 Stat. 411

  • Frank Burt Jr

    Frank Burt Jr Alabama

    Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. 139 Cong. Rec. H1302-01, 139 Cong. Rec. H1302-01, H1303, 1993 WL 75661

    Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.

    Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government.

    139 Cong. Rec. H1302-01, 139 Cong. Rec. H1302-01, H1303, 1993 WL 75661

  • John Ryan

    John Ryan California

    There are two forms of money – asset money and debt money. The asset money is on the private side; the debt money is on the public side. You have 2 different venues. You have a private and a public. And if you stay on the private side, you will never have a problem – when you get over into the public side, this is where you get into the legal fiction. When your parents signed the birth certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man. . In commercial law its called a Stramnineus Homo, Which is a legal fiction or straw man. And what they did was they registered it with the dept of commerce. First, they register it with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept. of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC. The deposit trust clearing corp is the parent company (DTCC). The Jesuits out of Rome, Italy control this. The guy that owns the Federal Reserve System is called his name is Hans Van Clovenbach. He’s called the black pope. They own the Vatican, the Roman Catholic Church, the pentagon and the United Nations, which is a military industrial complex. They run our government

    There are two forms of money – asset money and debt money. The asset money is on the private side; the debt money is on the public side. You have 2 different venues. You have a private and a public. And if you stay on the private side, you will never have a problem – when you get over into the public side, this is where you get into the legal fiction. When your parents signed the birth certificate, they created a legal fiction called a straw man. . In commercial law its called a Stramnineus Homo, Which is a legal fiction or straw man. And what they did was they registered it with the dept of commerce. First, they register it with the bureau of vital statistics, and then they register it with the dept. of commerce. Then they register it with the DTC.

    The deposit trust clearing corp is the parent company (DTCC). The Jesuits out of Rome, Italy control this. The guy that owns the Federal Reserve System is called his name is Hans Van Clovenbach. He’s called the black pope. They own the Vatican, the Roman Catholic Church, the pentagon and the United Nations, which is a military industrial complex. They run our government

  • Timothy Farley

    Timothy Farley California

    I just read an article that the IRS is giving extensions because their website crashed (Go Figure) Nevertheless If there is no money, how can you have a creditor? What I'm telling you here today is what is going on in the courtroom. The court system is tied into the DTCC – and they (DTCC) own these companies right here - DTC, NSCC (National Securities Clearing Corp), MSCC (Mutual Securities Corp), GSCC (Government Securities Clearing Corp). There are two of these companies Depository Trust Corporation, and The Depository Trust Company – two separate entities under the DTCC. These are all subdivisions of the DTCC. I have a 150 page treatise on a CD with all this stuff on it – all the laws they are using, everything. It has a disclosure statement on the DTC. It’s a 55-page document. I’ll show you how to order that if you want to order it. You should sit down and study this stuff before you ever go into a Court Room. Cases are won and lost before you ever get to court. These are all trust companies. And they are all Banks. This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The DTC it’s nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee. As in when they ceded the State of Maryland to the District of Colombia. Revolt

    I just read an article that the IRS is giving extensions because their website crashed (Go Figure)

    Nevertheless If there is no money, how can you have a creditor? What I'm telling you here today is what is going on in the courtroom. The court system is tied into the DTCC – and they (DTCC) own these companies right here - DTC, NSCC (National Securities Clearing Corp), MSCC (Mutual Securities Corp), GSCC (Government Securities Clearing Corp). There are two of these companies Depository Trust Corporation, and The Depository Trust Company – two separate entities under the DTCC. These are all subdivisions of the DTCC.

    I have a 150 page treatise on a CD with all this stuff on it – all the laws they are using, everything. It has a disclosure statement on the DTC. It’s a 55-page document. I’ll show you how to order that if you want to order it. You should sit down and study this stuff before you ever go into a Court Room. Cases are won and lost before you ever get to court. These are all trust companies. And they are all Banks. This company right here (DTC) is a securities depository and settlement company. The DTC it’s nominee (nominee means name) is called CEDE and company. That’s the nominee. As in when they ceded the State of Maryland to the District of Colombia.

    Revolt

  • Terry Phillips

    Terry Phillips Colorado

    "Many believe that they are required to pay an "income tax" to a branch of the United States government called "The Internal Revenue Service". The origins and history of the IRS shows just how in error these beliefs are. Not only is there no law that requires most Americans to file an individual tax return, but the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) wasn't even created by an act of Congress! Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution of the United States of America, in pertinent part, provides that: ". . . direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons . . . three-fifths of all other Persons." In 1894, Congress passed a law which purportedly imposed a "direct income tax" on the Citizens of the several States within this Union, but failed to make any provision for apportionment, as required by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution of the United States of America. In the case of Pollack vs. Farmers Loan &amp; Trust Co., US (1895), the U.S. Supreme Court struck the law down, as being unconstitutional, because it failed to make any provision for apportionment, as required by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3. Thereafter, Congress passed the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which was "declared" to have been ratified in 1913. The Sixteenth Amendment provides that: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration." "All Rights Reserved"

    "Many believe that they are required to pay an "income tax" to a branch of the United States government called "The Internal Revenue Service". The origins and history of the IRS shows just how in error these beliefs are. Not only is there no law that requires most Americans to file an individual tax return, but the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) wasn't even created by an act of Congress!
    Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution of the United States of America, in pertinent part, provides that: ". . . direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons . . . three-fifths of all other Persons."

    In 1894, Congress passed a law which purportedly imposed a "direct income tax" on the Citizens of the several States within this Union, but failed to make any provision for apportionment, as required by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3, of the Constitution of the United States of America. In the case of Pollack vs. Farmers Loan & Trust Co., US (1895), the U.S. Supreme Court struck the law down, as being unconstitutional, because it failed to make any provision for apportionment, as required by Article I, Section 2, Clause 3.

    Thereafter, Congress passed the Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which was "declared" to have been ratified in 1913. The Sixteenth Amendment provides that: "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."

    "All Rights Reserved"

  • James Whitmer

    James Whitmer Iowa

    “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia , and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” Catha v United States , 152 US , at 215

    “The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the states, but have force only in the District of Columbia , and other places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national government.” Catha v United States , 152 US , at 215

  • Lesley Israel

    Lesley Israel Maryland

    In 1942, for the first time in the history of this country, the Bureau of Internal Revenue sent out 1040 Form to the general public in the forty-eight States. This was done even though the Victory Tax Act of 1942 only applied to citizens and residents of the District of Columbia, and non-resident aliens. Most people thought that the Victory Tax Act required everyone to file a tax return and pay tax on "income", so they voluntarily filed a Form 1040 in 1942, 1943 and 1944. On May 29, 1944, Congress repealed the Victory Tax Act of 1942, but the news media did not publicize that fact. In 1945, the Bureau of Internal Revenue decided to mass mail 1040 Forms to the general public, just to see what would happen. Why not? The vast majority of the people had voluntarily file tax returns before. Since the public believed that the Victory Tax Act was mandatory in the then forty-eight (48) States, and did not know that it had been repealed, they filled out the 1040 Forms and mailed them in, along with their checks. The Bureau of Internal Revenue was ecstatic and committed itself to continue perpetrating the fraud on the Citizens of the forty-eight (48) States. So, the Bureau of Internal Revenue has continued to send out Form 1040's each and every year since. Don’t be fooled. The "Internal Revenue Code" was first enacted in 1939 and was called the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939". Since that time, the name of the Public Salary Tax Act was changed to the "Internal Revenue Code", which was amended in 1953 and 1987. However, the amendments did not change the fact that it only applies to the District of Columbia and the federal territories and possessions. There is no provision in the Internal Revenue Code that imposes a direct income tax on the Citizens of the fifty (50) States, nor a requirement to file an income tax return, unless employed by the Federal Government. If you are a Citizen of Florida, a Republic, or any other state, and not a Federal Employee, nor a citizen or resident of the District of Columbia, you are not required by law to file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return

    In 1942, for the first time in the history of this country, the Bureau of Internal Revenue sent out 1040 Form to the general public in the forty-eight States. This was done even though the Victory Tax Act of 1942 only applied to citizens and residents of the District of Columbia, and non-resident aliens.

    Most people thought that the Victory Tax Act required everyone to file a tax return and pay tax on "income", so they voluntarily filed a Form 1040 in 1942, 1943 and 1944. On May 29, 1944, Congress repealed the Victory Tax Act of 1942, but the news media did not publicize that fact. In 1945, the Bureau of Internal Revenue decided to mass mail 1040 Forms to the general public, just to see what would happen. Why not? The vast majority of the people had voluntarily file tax returns before. Since the public believed that the Victory Tax Act was mandatory in the then forty-eight (48) States, and did not know that it had been repealed, they filled out the 1040 Forms and mailed them in, along with their checks. The Bureau of Internal Revenue was ecstatic and committed itself to continue perpetrating the fraud on the Citizens of the forty-eight (48) States. So, the Bureau of Internal Revenue has continued to send out Form 1040's each and every year since.

    Don’t be fooled. The "Internal Revenue Code" was first enacted in 1939 and was called the "Public Salary Tax Act of 1939". Since that time, the name of the Public Salary Tax Act was changed to the "Internal Revenue Code", which was amended in 1953 and 1987. However, the amendments did not change the fact that it only applies to the District of Columbia and the federal territories and possessions.

    There is no provision in the Internal Revenue Code that imposes a direct income tax on the Citizens of the fifty (50) States, nor a requirement to file an income tax return, unless employed by the Federal Government. If you are a Citizen of Florida, a Republic, or any other state, and not a Federal Employee, nor a citizen or resident of the District of Columbia, you are not required by law to file a U.S. Individual Income Tax Return

  • Robert Leonard

    Robert Leonard Maryland

    You know I meant to drop some bombs on here yesterday as that was officially “Tax Day” Lol sometimes you just have to sit back and laugh at the game and how it’s being played. That said for all you good “citizens” out there filling out those 1040’s ----------&gt; Form 1040 26 CFR 602.101, contains a cross-reference table, showing that the only form authorized for use in filing a "U.S. Individual Income Tax return" is assigned OMB Number 1545-0067. That number only appears on Form 2555, entitled "Foreign Earned Income", and states that it is to be attached to a Form 1040. Form 1040 is assigned OMB Number 1545-0074, and is only authorized to be used for reporting various types of "credits" to be set off against the "Foreign Earned Income" reported on Form 2555. If you did not have any "Foreign Earned Income" during a year, you cannot file a Form 2555 without committing perjury. If you did not need to claim any tax credits during the year, there is no need or requirement to file a Form 1040

    You know I meant to drop some bombs on here yesterday as that was officially “Tax Day” Lol sometimes you just have to sit back and laugh at the game and how it’s being played. That said for all you good “citizens” out there filling out those 1040’s ---------->

    Form 1040
    26 CFR 602.101, contains a cross-reference table, showing that the only form authorized for use in filing a "U.S. Individual Income Tax return" is assigned OMB Number 1545-0067. That number only appears on Form 2555, entitled "Foreign Earned Income", and states that it is to be attached to a Form 1040. Form 1040 is assigned OMB Number 1545-0074, and is only authorized to be used for reporting various types of "credits" to be set off against the "Foreign Earned Income" reported on Form 2555. If you did not have any "Foreign Earned Income" during a year, you cannot file a Form 2555 without committing perjury. If you did not need to claim any tax credits during the year, there is no need or requirement to file a Form 1040

  • William Rauwerdink

    William Rauwerdink Michigan

    You know what put Nixon on the board too. It was under his term we went off the Gold standard. This is why gold is still valued on the books today at $42.00 an ounce. If it were to priced at what it would take to back the current money supply we would see gold prices at $14,000 an ounce. Last year The “Secretary of Treasury” did tweet all the gold was there. I’m more than willing to hold him to that.

    You know what put Nixon on the board too. It was under his term we went off the Gold standard. This is why gold is still valued on the books today at $42.00 an ounce. If it were to priced at what it would take to back the current money supply we would see gold prices at $14,000 an ounce. Last year The “Secretary of Treasury” did tweet all the gold was there. I’m more than willing to hold him to that.

  • Bruce Allen Azevedo

    Bruce Allen Azevedo Georgia

    Form 941 The definition of "Withholding Agent" contained in 26 USC 7701(16), which provides: Section 1441 is entitled "Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens". Section 1442 is entitled "Withholding tax on foreign corporations". Section 1443 is entitled "Foreign tax-exempt organizations". Section 1461 is entitled "Liability for withheld tax" and provides that: "Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any payments made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter." 26 USC, Chapter 24, Collection of Income Tax At Source, Withholding From Wages, Section 3401, Definitions, states: "(a) Wages. For purposes of this chapter, the term "wages" means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for services performed by an employee for his employer, . . . . "(c) Employee. For purposes of this chapter, the term "employee" includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term "employee" also includes an officer of a corporation." "(d) Employer. For purposes of the chapter, the term "employer" means the person for whom an individual performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as the employee of such person, . . ." If you have never applied for appointment, nor have been appointed, as a "Withholding Agent", and have never been required to withhold "wages", pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1441, 1442 or 1443. Nor if you have never paid any "wages" to a "foreign alien" or "foreign corporation", you would not be liable for any wages withheld from nonresident aliens or foreign corporations under the provisions of Section 1461, of the Internal Revenue Code, therefore, you would not be required to file a Form 941.

    Form 941

    The definition of "Withholding Agent" contained in 26 USC 7701(16), which provides:
    Section 1441 is entitled "Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens". Section 1442 is entitled "Withholding tax on foreign corporations". Section 1443 is entitled "Foreign tax-exempt organizations". Section 1461 is entitled "Liability for withheld tax" and provides that:

    "Every person required to deduct and withhold any tax under this chapter is hereby made liable for such tax and is hereby indemnified against the claims and demands of any person for the amount of any payments made in accordance with the provisions of this chapter."
    26 USC, Chapter 24, Collection of Income Tax At Source, Withholding From Wages, Section 3401, Definitions, states:

    "(a) Wages.
    For purposes of this chapter, the term "wages" means all remuneration (other than fees paid to a public official) for services performed by an employee for his employer,
    . . . .
    "(c) Employee.
    For purposes of this chapter, the term "employee" includes an officer, employee, or elected official of the United States, a State, or any political subdivision thereof, or the District of Columbia, or any agency or instrumentality of any one or more of the foregoing. The term "employee" also includes an officer of a corporation."

    "(d) Employer.
    For purposes of the chapter, the term "employer" means the person for whom an individual performs or performed any service, of whatever nature, as the employee of such person, . . ."

    If you have never applied for appointment, nor have been appointed, as a "Withholding Agent", and have never been required to withhold "wages", pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1441, 1442 or 1443. Nor if you have never paid any "wages" to a "foreign alien" or "foreign corporation", you would not be liable for any wages withheld from nonresident aliens or foreign corporations under the provisions of Section 1461, of the Internal Revenue Code, therefore, you would not be required to file a Form 941.

  • Eileen Feinstein Mariano

    Eileen Feinstein Mariano California

    All natives are not citizens of the United States; the descendants of the aborigines, and those of African origins, are not entitled to the rights of citizens. Anterior to the adoption of the constitution of the United States, each state had the right to make citizens of such persons as it pleased. That constitution does not authorize any but white persons to become citizens of the United States; and it must therefore be presumed that no one is a citizen who is not white. {1 Litt. R. 334; 10 Conn. R. 340; 1 Meigs, R. 331 A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government. Kitchens V Steele, 112 F Supp 383 God Bless Young N Reckless

    All natives are not citizens of the United States; the descendants of the aborigines, and those of African origins, are not entitled to the rights of citizens. Anterior to the adoption of the constitution of the United States, each state had the right to make citizens of such persons as it pleased. That constitution does not authorize any but white persons to become citizens of the United States; and it must therefore be presumed that no one is a citizen who is not white. {1 Litt. R. 334; 10 Conn. R. 340; 1 Meigs, R. 331

    A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government. Kitchens V Steele, 112 F Supp 383

    God Bless Young N Reckless

  • James O’ Connor

    James O’ Connor Arizona

    On June 20, 1874, the President with advice of Senate abolished and replaced the 1871 government with a commission consisting of three persons. 18 Stat. at L. 116, chap. 337 A subsequent act approved June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102, chap. 180) was enacted stating that the District of Columbia should 'remain and continue a municipal corporation,' as provided in 2 of the Revised Statutes relating to said District (brought forward from the act of 1871)

    On June 20, 1874, the President with advice of Senate abolished and replaced the 1871 government with a commission consisting of three persons.

    18 Stat. at L. 116, chap. 337

    A subsequent act approved June 11, 1878 (20 Stat. at L. 102, chap. 180) was enacted stating that the District of Columbia should 'remain and continue a municipal corporation,' as provided in 2 of the Revised Statutes relating to said District
    (brought forward from the act of 1871)

  • Rollie Heath

    Rollie Heath Colorado

    "The Supreme Court ruled in Youngstown Sheet &amp; Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952) that Executive Order 10340 from President Harry S. Truman placing all steel mills in the country under federal control was invalid because it attempted to make law,..." See: Opinion of Justice Black and Case Law Furthermore "a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the U.S. government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[6] Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order."

    "The Supreme Court ruled in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952) that Executive Order 10340 from President Harry S. Truman placing all steel mills in the country under federal control was invalid because it attempted to make law,..." See: Opinion of Justice Black and Case Law

    Furthermore "a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the U.S. government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[6] Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order."

  • Polly Baca

    Polly Baca Colorado

    Those in power behind the scenes dress up their candidates for office, help them get elected, and then control them while in office. Supposedly giving you a choice when both major Political parties and other parties are controlled by them. Their controlled major media is used to control and direct public opinion. So, you wonder who is really in control--It's definitely not the people

    Those in power behind the scenes dress up their candidates for office, help them get elected, and then control them while in office. Supposedly giving you a choice when both major Political parties and other parties are controlled by them. Their controlled major media is used to control and direct public opinion. So, you wonder who is really in control--It's definitely not the people

  • Edward Piazza

    Edward Piazza Connecticut

    US citizens (Chattel Property) are belligerents in the field and are "subject to its jurisdiction" (Washington DC) U.S. citizens are 14th Amendment citizens implemented by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 originally established for the newly freed slaves. That is to say: "Now slaves of the corporate government plantation"

    US citizens (Chattel Property) are belligerents in the field and are
    "subject to its jurisdiction"
    (Washington DC)

    U.S. citizens are 14th Amendment citizens implemented by the Civil Rights Act of 1866 originally established for the newly freed slaves.
    That is to say: "Now slaves of the corporate government plantation"

  • Faith Garamendi

    Faith Garamendi California

    "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders." Chairman Louis T. McFadden, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932. Federal Reserve is not listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true. And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality's . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations - federal reserve banks are listed neither as 'wholly-owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671."

    "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders." Chairman Louis T. McFadden, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932.

    Federal Reserve is not listed under the Federal Government. They are in the white pages, along with Federal Express, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC), and any other business. Find out for yourself if all this is true. And then, go to your local law library and look up the case of Lewis vs. US, case #80-5905, 9th Circuit, June 24, 1982. It reads in part: "Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks and applying the relevant factors, we conclude that the federal reserve are NOT federal instrumentality's . . but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations - federal reserve banks are listed neither as 'wholly-owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856] . . . 28 USC Sections 1346(b), 2671."

  • Tommy Lan

    Tommy Lan Arizona

    Yo this blog is wild. I gotta print some of this shit out. How the hell do you all know so much case law and shit. This is equivalent to being in the law library or some shit. Damn

    Yo this blog is wild. I gotta print some of this shit out. How the hell do you all know so much case law and shit. This is equivalent to being in the law library or some shit. Damn

  • Chia-Chi Teng

    Chia-Chi Teng Utah

    "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders." Chairman Louis T. McFadden, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932

    "Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are U.S. government institutions. They are not government institutions. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the U.S. for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers and rich and predatory money lenders." Chairman Louis T. McFadden, House Banking and Currency Committee, June 10, 1932

  •  Mary Sue McClurkin

    Mary Sue McClurkin Alabama

    Many of the older generations of the American people were taught to write the "S" with two lines through it. The two lines was a derivative of the "U" inside the "S" signifying "Units of Silver". The United States of America silver dollar is the accepted and approved uniform monetary unit (coin standard). The United States of America did not issue paper money until 85 years after its independence from Britain, and when it did, it was backed by silver or gold. Even at that, early Californians refused to accept and use paper currency, especially the people in San Francisco. Today, all computer programs, stock certificates, financial paper, accounting records, balance sheets and summaries, bills, bonds, Promissory notes, bank paper such as checks, et cetera use the familiar symbol $ having only one line through it to denote the amount of debt considered.

    Many of the older generations of the American people were taught to write the "S" with two lines through it. The two lines was a derivative of the "U" inside the "S" signifying "Units of Silver". The United States of America silver dollar is the accepted and approved uniform monetary unit (coin standard). The United States of America did not issue paper money until 85 years after its independence from Britain, and when it did, it was backed by silver or gold. Even at that, early Californians refused to accept and use paper currency, especially the people in San Francisco.

    Today, all computer programs, stock certificates, financial paper, accounting records, balance sheets and summaries, bills, bonds, Promissory notes, bank paper such as checks, et cetera use the familiar symbol $ having only one line through it to denote the amount of debt considered.

Please or register to post.

Add comment